Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pitner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This case is a direct appeal from judgment of sentence. The charges arose from three drug sales in which Appellant was involved. The issues are: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain Appellant’s convictions for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia with respect to the first drug sale; (2) whether the trial court erred by admitting prior statements of a Commonwealth witness as substantive evidence; (3) whether the court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress certain evidence; (4) whether Appellant’s various sentences for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. ConklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. RaynerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. HabaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API