Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 8:12-cv-03725-AWPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Strike. The Court has reviewed the record and deems a hearing unnecessary. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Strike.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a Maryland corporation headquartered in Bethesda. Plaintiff alleges that it is a global security and aerospace company that primarily researches, designs, manufactures, integrates, and sustains advanced technology systems and products. Plaintiff further alleges that it makes substantial sales to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Brinkley v. Harbour Recreation ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Lane v. PageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Baron v. DIRECTV, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- LBCMT 2007-C3 Urbana Pike, LLC v. SheppardDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Loi Nguyen v. Durham School Services, L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Crump v. Mecklenburg County Detention Center OfficersDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Dmarcian, Inc. v. DMARC Advisor BVDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.