Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Shurly
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On August 18,1922, the plaintiff interviewed the defendant at his hospital in Detroit concerning the removal of the tonsils of her son Frederick, then 19 years of age. She testified:
“When Dr. Shurly came in, I told him that my son’s tonsils are affected and I would like to have them removed. He said all right and now we will have to. ask about the anesthetic, whether a local or a general. He said the local is cocaine and the general is ether. I told him I had been advised by the family physician, Dr. Douglas, who is now dead, never to use cocaine on myself or my family, not even for a tooth.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Gacesa v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Luka v. LowrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bakker v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re Dzwonkiewicz's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Bonner v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Combs v. YoungeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.