Legal Opinion

Stangair v. Roads

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1906No. 5968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, McCredie, J., entered February 18, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to establish ai lost boundary.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

This was a proceeding to establish a lost boundary, under Bal. Code, § 5667. A determination of the *584issue between the parties depends solely upon the true location of the northeast corner of the John Stangair donation claim, it being admitted that the respondent owns the land described in his complaint lying immediately to the north of the north line of said donation claim, and the appellant the adjoining land lying immediately to the south of said line. The testimony in the case is uncertain rather than conflicting. The respondent contends that the northeast corner of the Stangair donation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadeau v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Clark v. ThornburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hubbard v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Goss v. GolinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Hein v. NuttArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Stangair v. RoadsWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Garnsey v. PostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API