Legal Opinion
Spinner Corp. v. Princeville Development Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1988No. 87-2076PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Princeville Development Corp. (Prince-ville) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its “baby” FTC Act claim under Haw.Rev.Stat. § 480-2 against Morgan, Olm-stead, Kennedy, and Gardner Inc. (Morgan Olmstead). We affirm.
*389I.
PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In late 1985, Spinner Corp. launched a hostile tender offer against Princeville. Morgan Olmstead served as Spinner’s investment banker and advisor. At approximately the same time, Morgan Olmstead was attempting to negotiate an agreement to act as Princeville’s investment advisor for a private placement of convertible…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Bulgo v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Denison v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.