Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 8, 2011No. 603, 2010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-Below/Appellant, Victor Rodriguez, appeals from his convictions in Superior Court for Reckless Burning, Burglary in the Third Degree, two counts of Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree, and three counts of Arson in the Second Degree. At issue is the trial judge’s decision allowing a latent fingerprint examiner, who had also been trained in tire track and shoeprint analyses, to testify as an expert that boot and tire tracks at arson scenes were consistent with Rodriguez’s boot and the tire on his mountain bike. The trial judge found the examiner to be qualified by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Rodgers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Estate of Valdez v. BNSF Railway CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  3. Heck v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026
  4. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021
  5. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API