Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 3, 2006No. PD-0645-05PublishedCited by 218 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
In this case we hold that a motion to strike an expert witness’s testimony based on his lack of qualifications, which is made after the witness has testified, can serve as a renewed objection to the trial court’s earlier ruling that the witness was qualified. In these circumstances, an appellate court reviews the trial court’s ruling based upon all of the evidence before the court at the time of the motion to strike. Although we disavow some of the language in the court of appeals’s opinion, we affirm its…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Weatherred v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Rachal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by218 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Vela v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Rhomer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
- Billodeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.