Legal Opinion
Northland Insurance Co. v. Kellogg
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 1995No. 84508PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
This is a permissable appeal from an interlocutory order in which the trial court overruled plaintiffs motion to compel arbitration. After a review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we affirm.
Plaintiff Northland Insurance Company initiated this action by filing its petition seeking damages from Defendant Billy G. Kellogg d/b/a Kellogg Insurance Agency, North-land’s agent, for alleged negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. Northland requested a jury trial.
Defendant answered, and the cause proceeded through considerable discovery, opposing summary judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- S & H Contractors, Inc., a Corporation v. A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc., a Corporation, A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc. v. S & H Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Griffith v. LintonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Towe, Hester & Erwin, Inc. v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Holm-Sutherland Co., Inc. v. Town of ShelbyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Booker v. SumnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- HOWELL'S WELL SERVICE v. FOCUS GROUP ADVISORSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.