Legal Opinion
Vickie Bell v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2018No. 17-1051PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation ("Pulmosan") appeals the district court's grant of default judgment, arguing that it was never properly served. We agree and reverse.
I. Background
Pulmosan is a defunct New York corporation that produced industrial safety equipment intended to prevent inhalation of pneumoconiosis-causing dusts such as *713 silica. In 1986, faced with numerous product liability claims, it filed a certificate of dissolution with the New York Secretary of State. Following the filing of its certificate of dissolution, Pulmosan eventually ceased to maintain a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. ArdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Fashion Page, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Printed Media Services, Inc. v. Solna Web, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Lyons v. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Baldwin v. Credit Based Asset Servicing & SecuritizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- PIRS Capital, LLC v. Renee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Bell v. Mine Safety Appliances CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018
- Bell v. The Townsend Corporation Of IndianaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Cal. Capital Ins. Co. v. HoehnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
- Guarin v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.