Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Arden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2010No. 09-2601PublishedCited by 240 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Susan and Robert Johnson filed a state civil suit making multiple claims against several defendants as a result of allegedly defamatory statements posted on an internet discussion board. The defendants removed the case to federal court. The original complaint included six defendants; however, the Johnsons located and served only InMotion Hosting, Inc. (“InMotion”), Melanie Lowry, and Kathleen Heineman.

The district court 2 dismissed the claims against InMotion with prejudice, finding that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) and (e)(3)…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by240 opinions

  1. Shrader v. BiddingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. J. Uriach & CIA, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Viasystems, Inc. v. EBM-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KGCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. v. Bassett & Walker International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Mark Myers v. Casino Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API