Legal Opinion

Thomasville Chair Co. v. United Furniture Workers of America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1950No. 666PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

No procedural question is raised. No facts are in dispute. The only ground upon which the award of the arbitrators is attacked by plaintiff’s motion or action is that the award is not within the scope of the agreement and that the arbitrators exceeded their powers.

The arbitration in this case was not instituted under the provisions of the statute, G.S. 1-544, eb seq., hut it was said in Copney v. Parks, 212 N.C. 217, 193 S.E. 21, “that the statutory methods of arbitration are to be regarded merely as constituting an enlargement on the common-law rule, and that the provisions of the statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. . KillebrewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Farmer v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Copney v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sadler ex rel. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers UnionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Smith v. YOUNG MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API