Legal Opinion

Tammy Siko v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01184Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAMMY SIKO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 23-1184 ) v. ) District Judge W. Scott Hardy ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS ) LP, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This employment discrimination action comes before the Court on Plaintiff Tammy Siko’s Objections (Docket No. 54) to the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 53) (“R&R”) entered by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on April 15, 2025. The R&R recommends that Defendant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP’s (“AstraZeneca”) Partial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API