Legal Opinion
Tomczuk v. American Mutual Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 25, 1986No. 4323PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant Meriden Record Company (Record), who was injured in a car accident in the course of his employment and *195awarded a judgment against the driver of the automobile, also an employee of Record, can prevail against Record on a theory of equitable subrogation to rights allegedly possessed by the driver against Record. The trial court, Higgins, J., held that the plaintiff cannot so prevail.1 We find no error.
The facts fairly provable under the fourth count are as follows: The plaintiff, an employee of Record, was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Hammett v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. DiGangiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Forbes v. BallaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Williams v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Burns v. Gleason Plant Security, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Espowood v. Springfield Terminal Ry. Co., No. 28 50 26 (Oct. 17, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990
- Frank v. Frank, No. 66226 (Dec. 22, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.