Legal Opinion
Hammett v. McIntyre
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 1952No. Civ. 18973PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Forrest M. Hammett brought an action for personal injuries sustained in a collision between the automobile in which he was riding and a Pontiac automobile operated by Lucille M. McIntyre and owned by the defendant J. B. McIntyre. It was charged that Lucille M. McIntyre was operating the Pontiac automobile with the consent of the owner, J. B. McIntyre. The law firm of Parker, Stan- . bury, Reese and McGee filed an answer on behalf of both Lucille M. McIntyre and J. B. McIntyre which included a denial that the Pontiac automobile was being operated by Lucille M. McIntyre with the knowledge or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Pennix v. WintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Employers Casualty Company v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Allstate Insurance v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.