Legal Opinion

Martin v. Chief Game Warden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 22, 1931No. 13150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs Martin and Roth, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, for the purpose of obtaining a judicial construction of what is known as the Hide Buyers’ Act, 36 Stat., 1348, establishing the rights of the plaintiffs and other parties affected thereby, and that pending such adjudication the officers charged with the enforcement of the statute be enjoined from collecting the license thereunder and from enforcing the penalties provided therein. •

The plaintiffs are not connected…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Garrison v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Sirrine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. Wingfield v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. PutnamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API