Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Daniel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1936No. 14227Published

1DissentJustice Boni-iam

(dissenting) : “This is an action in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to prevent the towns and cities of South Carolina -from enforcing by arresting and prosecuting parties who are employed by wholesale liquor distributing companies for alleged violation of license ordinances in the various towns and cities for the delivery of whiskey to retail license (liquor) stores within said towns and cities.”

This succinct and clear statement of the purpose of the action is the statement contained in the transcript of record.

The petition was addressed to the “Hon. D. Gordon Baker, Associate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Richmond v. Town of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Lord & Polk Chemical Co. v. Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Town of WinnsboroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Pee Dee Chair Co. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API