Legal Opinion

In re W.T.L.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2002No. 00-FS-1403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

Appellant, through counsel, appeals from the trial court’s finding of fact that appellant’s son, W.T.L., was neglected as defined by D.C.Code § 16-2301(9) (1981). This case came on for trial upon a petition alleging neglect under paragraphs (B), (C), and (D) of § 16-2301,1 which ultimately resulted in the trial court’s committing W.T.L. into the charge of thé Child and Family Services Agency ("CFSA”) of the Department of Human Services. Appellant appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support the neglect finding. We reject that contention and affirm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Appeal of A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In re T.R.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In Re AHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In re Z.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API