Legal Opinion
Magraw v. Donovan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1959No. Civ. 2981PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order permitting plaintiffs to dismiss the action without prejudice to any of the parties.
Plaintiffs, who are residents of the more populous areas of the state of Minnesota, in this action seek a determination that their representation, and the representation of other residents similarly situated, in the Minnesota Legislature under the 1913 Minnesota Legislative Redistricting Act, is so inadequate and unequal as to deprive…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Magraw v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Bolten v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Moss v. BurkhartDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1962
- Honsey v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
- Lamson v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.