Legal Opinion

Bello v. Howard University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-2106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Rukayatu E. Bello, Mercedes A. Woodson, Olayinka Oni-Orisan, Fatima Rashid, and Kera Singleton (“Plaintiffs”), have filed the above-captioned case against Defendant Howard University (“Defendant”) and Defendant’s former employee, George Bright-Abu (“Bright-Abu”), asserting claims arising from Bright-Abu’s alleged sexual “physical and verbal assaults” of Plaintiffs. See generally Compl., ECF No. [1]. Plaintiffs, who, during all times relevant to the instant Complaint, were work-study students enrolled at Howard University and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen-Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Art and Drama Therapy Institute, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Frederick v. HillyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Cheatham v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API