Legal Opinion
Loden v. Getty Oil Company
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 8, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
Plaintiff, administratrix of the estate of Carlton L. Loden, Jr. [deceased] seeks to recover against Getty Oil Company [Getty] for serious injuries which deceased suffered while working at the site of the Getty refinery near Delaware City on April 10, 1972 when the cutting torch which deceased was using to cut a pipe fitting ignited oil which was in the pipe. Deceased was hired and paid by Catalytic Construction Company [Catalytic]. Getty has moved for summary judgment on the ground that deceased was an employee of Getty at the time of the accident, and therefore, this action is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gooden & Clark v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1941
- Lester C. Newton Trucking Company v. NealSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Balma v. Tidewater Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Richardson v. John T. Hardy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Chaiken v. Employment Security CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Haft v. Dart Group Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Hicks v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Dickinson v. Eastern Railroad Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Getty Oil Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.