Legal Opinion
Kelley Kar Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1956No. Civ. 21618PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The judgment herein awarded the Kelley Kar Company possession of a Mercury automobile which it had sold on a conditional sale contract. The vehicle was allegedly purchased with money stolen from an Oklahoma bank and the trade-in of a Buick automobile. Appellant, insurer of the bank and now its subrogee by virtue of having paid the loss, demands the value of the Buick which was traded in on the Mercury, and the identifiable stolen money in order to recoup its loss as insurer of the bank.
On July 29, 1954, one James D. Holland robbed the Farmers National Bank of Erick, Oklahoma, taking therefrom…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Baxter v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- State Nat. Bank of Boston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Knapp v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hilliard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, an Ohio Corporation v. Ruth L. Smith, Richard Lowell Smith, Donna Gene Smith and John C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1969
- City of Portland v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Frank v. McLain (In Re Peet Packing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Welborne v. Ryman-Carroll Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.