Legal Opinion
State v. Faber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1984No. CX-83-246PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the gross misdemeanor offense of aggravated driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1 (1982). The conviction was based on a conditional guilty plea, which reserved defendant’s right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress his blood test results on fourth amendment grounds.
As we held in State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (Minn.1980), the Rules of Criminal Procedure do not recognize the conditional guilty plea. We stated in Loth-enbach that a defendant may properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WhitmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. KagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Nohre v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.