United States Ex Rel. Julius Petrofsky v. Van Cott
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
588 F.2d 1327
25 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 82,936
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Julius PETROFSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL, McCARTHY, a Utah Law Firm which
is also a Utah Corporation; and Utah attorneys: C. Keith
Rooker, Clifford Ashton, Robert M. Anderson, Grant H.
Bagley, Dennis McCarthy, Ray G. Martineau, Richard W.
Giauque, Brent Giauque, Ricardo B. Ferrari, Haldor T.
Benson, Scott E. Savage, Dale A. Kimball, Grant Macfarlane,
Jr., Chris Wangsgard, and David Greenwood, and John Doe # 1
through John Doe # 10, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 78-1576.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burt v. City of Palm SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of KenyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Application of Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Baker-Lockwood Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lu, Friedrich v. Ou, DavidCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004