Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Caravan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Initially, we do not find that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board abused its discretion in rejecting claimant’s *973application to reopen the Board’s prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (cf., Matter of Schwartz [Creative Tutoring— Roberts], 91 AD2d 778). In any event, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant was discharged due to misconduct because he failed to follow the proper procedures when notifying his employer that he would be absent (see, Matter of Michelfelder [Ross], 80 AD2d 969).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Claim of MichelfelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Claim of JimenezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of SahagianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of McPhailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of AshfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.