McClintock v. Bi-State Development Agency
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
Defendant, Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State), brings this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308) from an order of the circuit court of St. Clair County which set aside a previous ruling that Bi-State was entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff had not complied with section 8 — 102 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 85, par. 8 — 102). The questions presented for our consideration are: (1) whether plaintiff’s action against Bi-State is subject to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maki v. FrelkIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Cooper v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Smith v. County of WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Grady v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClintock v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992