Legal Opinion

McClintock v. Bi-State Development Agency

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 7, 1992No. 5—91—0364PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Defendant, Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State), brings this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308) from an order of the circuit court of St. Clair County which set aside a previous ruling that Bi-State was entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff had not complied with section 8 — 102 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 85, par. 8 — 102). The questions presented for our consideration are: (1) whether plaintiff’s action against Bi-State is subject to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maki v. FrelkIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cooper v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Smith v. County of WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Grady v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McClintock v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API