Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Bi-State Development Agency

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 1987No. 5-86-0703PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE EARNS

delivered the opinion-of the court:

Defendant, Bi-State Development Agency, appeals, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308(a) (87 Ill. 2d R. 308(a)), from a judgment of the circuit court of St. Clair County denying defendant’s motion to reconsider its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action for personal injuries she allegedly sustained while a passenger on a bus owned and operated by defendant.

On July 5, 1984, defendant received a letter from plaintiff’s attorney advising defendant that he had been retained to represent plaintiff on her claim for personal injuries resulting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fujimura v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Schuman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In Re HaberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Getto v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hubble v. Bi-State Development AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Schoonover v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Pence v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. McClintock v. Bi-State Development AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Slaughter v. Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API