Loeser v. Goldberg
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBridwell, J.
— Appellants instituted this action against appellees to quiet title to certain real estate in Vigo County, Indiana, of which they claim ownership under the will of one Jennie Goldberg, deceased. Upon the trial of the causé there was a finding and judgment for the appellees, and this appeal followed.
Appellees insist that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed because appellants’ brief does not comply with clause 5 of Rule 22 of the rules of this court, and assert that the Rules of Court are binding, not only on litigants, but also upon this court. We must agree with the latter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Earl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Baker v. StehleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Partlow v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. MoiseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Martin v. PetginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Parliament v. TaberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Breuninger v. WeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.