Legal Opinion
Baker v. Conoco Pipeline Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 18, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00837PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Sam A. Joyner on July 3, 2003 (Docket No. 59) addressing Defendants’ Motion For Stay Of Proceedings And For Order Compelling Arbitration (Docket No. 21), filed April 3, 2003.
In their motion, Defendants request that the present action be stayed and all claims submitted to arbitration. Defendants rely on an arbitration clause contained in an easement governing the real property in dispute in this case. Plaintiffs, however, argue that the arbitration provision does…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Talley v. HesseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Wilson v. Berger Briggs Real Est. & Ins.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Lemus v. CMH Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Alta Mesa Holdings, LP v. Kingfisher Midstream, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Belgravia Hartford Capital, Inc. v. Stinson, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.