Legal Opinion

Colorado Iron Works v. Taylor

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1899No. 1515PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of San Miguel County,

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This is an action in which the appellant seeks to enforce a mechanic’s lien for work and labor done upon and materials furnished for the erection of certain mill improvements upon certain mining claims and a mill site owned by the appellees. In order to a proper understanding of the issues, a somewhat lengthy statement of the facts is required. About August 21, 1894, appellees entered into a contract in writing with one W. A. Clark for the sale of the property in controversy for the sum of $65,000, to be paid at certain specified periods. The contract was in the first instance in the nature…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. ManskeIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Shapleigh v. HullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. TalbottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Boise Payette Lumber Co. v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Park City Meat Co. v. Comstock Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Longton v. HusungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Co. v. Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API