Legal Opinion

Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Co. v. Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1902No. 2103Published

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

*342Appellee Howe, as owner, leased to Kimball and Havens, for a term of three years, certain mining-property with the buildings, mills, machinery, tools and other equipments theretofore used in mining the same. The lease provided an option of purchase. Obligations of the lessee, imposed by the lease and pertinent to this ruling were to mine, operate and develop the property; to keep books of account wherein should be set down in detail all the expenses of operation, the amount paid for each item of mining supplies, tools, repairs and improvements, and to keep all buildings, machinery and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shapleigh v. HullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Colorado Iron Works v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API