Legal Opinion

Aubrey v. De Lozier

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 4, 1927No. 13560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This cause is brought to this court upon the appeal by the plaintiff in error, wherein she seeks to vacate aind set aside certain allowances!! made to the defendant In error, as guardian of her estate, and to surcharge the guardian with certain sums of money, and for convenience the plaintiff in error will be designated as plaintiff and the guardian as defendant.

It appears from the record that one Stein-horst was formerly guardian of Alice H. Aubrey, plaintiff, and her brother, Herbert *80Aubrey, and after bis removal, the defendant, Henry De Lozier, was appointed guardian of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lee v. TonsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Pyeatt v. EstusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Prentice v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Mitchell v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Tilman v. TilmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. In Re Boyd's GuardianshipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API