Legal Opinion

Stoica v. Pocol

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2001No. 27009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an Industrial Commission ease where the Commission found that an employer/employee relationship existed and that there was no basis within the statutory scheme to exempt the employer from the obligation to carry worker’s compensation insurance. We affirm the decision of the Commission.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Petre Stoica was injured in a work-related accident on August 15, 1997. He had been hired by Daniel Pocol, who trained him to help in Poeol’s carpet laying business. Stoica and Pocol are Romanian immigrants, and Pocol offered Stoica work to get him on his feet and even…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Flynn v. CarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Goodson v. LW Hult Produce CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Manning v. Win Her Stables, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Dewey v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shriner v. RauschIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Excell Construction, Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Moore v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Geff Stringer v. William RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Geff Stringer v. William RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API