Legal Opinion
Ranalli v. Breed
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for malpractice, the facts of which had not been discovered until the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 50) had run, order and the judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Tulloch v. Haselo (218 App. Div. 313) and Conklin v. Draper (229 id. 227; afld., 254 N. Y. 620). Present—■ Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Tulloch v. HaseloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golia v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Naetzker v. Brocton Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Kleinman v. LackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Troll v. GlantzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
- Simcuski v. SaeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.