Legal Opinion

Cambridge Iron & Metal Co. v. Hartman

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 1985No. 745, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief Judge.

Five Baltimore City firemen were injured in varying degrees while fighting a magnesium fire in a scrap metal yard owned by Cambridge Iron & Metal Company (Cambridge). The firemen 1 sued Cambridge in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. A jury, presided over by Judge David Ross, returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs in the aggregate sum of $618,000. Cambridge, in this Court, asserts that Judge Ross erred in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of Cambridge and in declining “to instruct the jury on opportunity to warn and a number of other legal issues.” The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aravanis v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Sherman v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Jenkins v. 313-321 W. 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Smith v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  5. Shypulski v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. New Summit Associates Ltd. Partnership v. NistleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Griffith v. Southland Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Griffith v. Southland Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API