Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Southland Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 30, 1992No. 1314, September Term, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
94 Md. App. 242 (1992)
617 A.2d 598
DAVID GRIFFITH
v.
THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION.
No. 1314, September Term, 1991.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.
December 30, 1992.
Keith R. Siskind (Forman & Steinhardt, P.A., on the brief), Glen Burnie, for appellant.
J. Paul Mullen, Stacey H. Schoenfeld and Lord & Whip, P.A., Baltimore, for amicus curiae, Maryland Ass'n of Defense Trial Counsel.
Gary I. Strausberg, Randall D. Getz, and Janet Strausberg, for amicus curiae, Maryland Trial Lawyers' Association.
William A. Franch (Ronald H. Jarashow, Robert R. Smith and Franch & Jarashow, P.A., on the brief),…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.