Legal Opinion
DiIorio v. National Union Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants have a duty to defend the plaintiff in an underlying personal injury action entitled Antonelli v DiIorio, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 4473/95, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 25, 1998, as, in effect, denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment declaring that the defendants GEICO and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company have a duty to defend him in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shapiro v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Brandstetter v. USAA Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Willard v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gottlieb v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Hodgson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001