Legal Opinion
Willard v. Preferred Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the cross motion of defendant seeking a declaration that it was not required to defend and indemnify plaintiff in the underlying action. In July 1995 plaintiff was employed as a lieutenant with the Town of Hamburg Police Department and Michael Sauer was employed as a detective. On or about July 26, 1995, plaintiff, verbally and in a written police report, accused Michael Sauer of committing the crime of criminal mischief…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Creative Housing Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Val-Blue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shapiro v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Brandstetter v. USAA Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iafallo v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hodgson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- DiIorio v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Emerson Enterprises, LLC v. Kenneth Crosby-New York, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- NXIVM CORPORATION v. ROSS INSTITUTEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019