Dodson Livestock Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The above-captioned case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for partial dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, the defendant has moved to dismiss the claim regarding seventeen of the eighteen sheep that are at issue in this ease. The plaintiff, Dodson Livestock Company (Dodson Livestock), filed a complaint for breach of contract in this court alleging that the United States, acting through the United States Department of Agriculture, Meat and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Affiliated Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Dodson Livestock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.