Legal Opinion
KNOLL PHARMACEUTICAL v. Auto. Ins. Co. of Hartford
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 13, 2001No. 00 C 6733PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Knoll Pharmaceutical Company (“Knoll”) filed this diversity lawsuit, seeking a declaration that Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford (“Automobile”), National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (“National Union”) and Royal Insurance Company of America (“Royal”) (collectively “Defendant Insurers”) owed a duty to defend Knoll in the underlying case, In re Synthroid Marketing Litigation, 110 F.Supp.2d 676 (N.D.I11.2000). Currently before this Court are Knoll’s and Defendant Insurers’ motions for judgment on the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Open Software Foundation, Inc., and Hewlett Packard Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- BASF AG v. Great American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Auto Europe, LLC v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- E. Piphany, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.