Legal Opinion
Parker Rust Proof Co. v. Detrex Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 2, 1953No. Civ. No. 12315PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNTON, District Judge.
The Court has before it two motions. One is a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant herein, the other is a motion to consolidate filed by the plaintiff herein. We shall discuss the motion to dismiss at the outset.
The defendant, Detrex Corporation, bases its motion to dismiss this suit on Rule 13(a) F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A., claiming that the instant suit is properly the subject matter of a compulsory counterclaim in another pending suit in which Detrex, defendant here, is the plaintiff. The other suit was commenced by Detrex in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dubler v. GilbertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Brown v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Metlon Corporation, and Hayden C. Cobb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Cuadrado Mestre v. García RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- Hall v. KiefferDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1956
- Cuadrado Mestre v. García RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- Sorsby v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.