Killian v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John B. Robbins, Chief Judge.
Appellant Henry Silas Kil-lian was convicted by a jury of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He was sentenced as an habitual offender to fifteen years in the Arkansas Department of Correction and fined $10,000.00. Mr. Killian now appeals, arguing only that the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdict. We affirm.
A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Durham v. State, 320 Ark. 689, 899 S.W.2d 470 (1995). The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the verdict is supported…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.