Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 6, 2001No. CA CR 00-748PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge.

Appellant was arrested and i /charged with: 1) possession of a schedule II controlled substance — methamphetamine; 2) manufacture of a schedule II controlled substance — methamphetamine; and 3) possession of drug paraphernalia. He was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellant’s first point on appeal is that the trial court erred in admitting the alleged drug paraphernalia. We disagree and affirm appellant’s paraphernalia conviction. Appellant also argues that the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Plotts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Cary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Littlepage v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API