Harts v. Wendell
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Logan County; the Hon. G-eobge W. Herdmah, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtWall, J.
The plaintiffs below recovered a judgment in an action of debt on a replevin bond.
The first question presented is whether certain items of expense for attorney’s fees and for printing, which were necessarily incurred in defeating the replevin case, can be included as a part of the damages in the suit on the bond. The conditions of the bond were, as required by statute, that the suit should be prosecuted with effect and the property returned, if so awarded, that the Sheriff should be saved and kept harmless, and further, tCfor the payment of all costs and damages occasioned by the wrongful…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Maguire v. Pan-American Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- First State Bank of Pond Creek v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- Edwin v. Cox ex rel. JacobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Lierly v. Motor Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.