Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court’s charge, read as a whole (see, People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830; People v Azzara, 138 AD2d 495, 496, lv denied 71 NY2d 1023), conveyed the relevant principle of law and correctly informed the jury that the burden of proof was upon the People to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt.

The prosecutor’s delay in turning over to defendant the police report written by one of the prosecution’s witnesses is not grounds for reversal because the delay did not substantially prejudice the defense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. CantyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. AzzaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. VeitiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API