Legal Opinion
Goss v. Clutch Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 10, 1985No. 83SC324PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari to review jury instructions defining a “material fact” within the context of section 11-51-125(1) of the Colorado Securities Act. The court of ap peals held that a factual omission or misrepresentation is material within the meaning of section 11-51-125(1) if it is such that a reasonable investor “might” consider it important in making an investment decision. Goss v. Clutch Exchange, Inc., 677 P.2d 355 (Colo.App.1983). We conclude that, although the case was correctly remanded to the district court for a new trial with directions as to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Austin v. LoftsgaardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Green v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Carol O'COnnOr v. R.F. Lafferty & Company, Inc. And Roy A. FoulkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. RiveraColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Van Shaack Holdings Ltd. v. Van SchaackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.