Legal Opinion

State v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1922No. 22,791PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from a conviction of assault in the second degree. After sentence, a motion for a new trial was heard and denied.

Defendant, a young farmer, resided near two tenant farmers in Waseca county by the name of Fred Cody and George B. Stehly. These neighbors had been on friendly terms, defendant and his wife having been invited by the latter to their home for ice cream on an evening a few weeks prior to the alleged assault. Shortly after that social visit,'a misunderstanding seems to have arisen out of the circumstance that a young lad who was to watch cattle for Cody *47and Stehly was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. State v. GaularppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Shaw v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. State v. PoelaertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API