Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Hill

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2015No. 13-4806, 13-4811, 13-4820PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge THACKER and Judge GRIMM joined.

DIAZ, Circuit Judge:

We consider here the scope of Fourth Amendment protections as applied to individuals on federal supervised release. In February 2013, Eric Barker was serving a term of supervised release in connection with a felony drug conviction. His conditions of supervised release required him, among other things, (1) to notify his probation officer if he moved and (2) to permit probation officers to visit him at home at any time and confiscate contraband in plain view.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Therl Taylor v. Virginia GrubbsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Juan LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Dustin CayaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
  5. Jones v. LaffertyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API