State v. Garcia
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Defendant was charged with two counts of interfering with a peace officer under ORS 162.247 and one count of resisting arrest under ORS 162.315 for her actions to prevent officers from arresting her boyfriend at a political march. Pursuant to ORS 162.247(3)(a), the statute defining the offense of interfering with a peace officer “does not apply” when the defendant is “engaging in *** [activity that would constitute resisting arrest.” At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the interfering counts, arguing that ORS 162.247(3) prohibited the state from charging her with both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- In the Interest of: P.L.S. v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KountzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019