Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2017No. CC 120545265; CA A152842; SC S064236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of interfering with a peace officer under ORS 162.247 and one count of resisting arrest under ORS 162.315 for her actions to prevent officers from arresting her boyfriend at a political march. Pursuant to ORS 162.247(3)(a), the statute defining the offense of interfering with a peace officer “does not apply” when the defendant is “engaging in *** [activity that would constitute resisting arrest.” At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the interfering counts, arguing that ORS 162.247(3) prohibited the state from charging her with both…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. In the Interest of: P.L.S. v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. KountzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API