Legal Opinion
Railex Corp. v. White Machine Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1965No. 64-C-1076PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Motion by defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss this patent infringement suit on the grounds that (1) this Court lacks in personam jurisdiction and (2) venue is improper. In the alternative, they ask that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a).
Defendants are New Jersey corporations, which operate as one entity, with General Offices and Factory located at 50 Boright Avenue, Kenilworth, New Jersey, and engage in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Chas. Pfizer & Co. v. Laboratori Pro-Ter Prodotti Therapeutici S. P. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Werner Machinery Co. v. National Cooperatives, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Nopco Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
- Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Heinz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.