Thorp v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Lincoln County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Actions by Víctor V. Thorp, by his mother and next friend, Martha C. Nigel, and by Martha O. Nigel, for herself, against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company and the Stroud Cotton Oil Company. Judgment in favor of the Stroud Cotton Oil Company, and for the Railroad on a directed verdict, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, O.
These actions were instituted by Victor Thorp for himself and by his mother to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused to him by the negligence and carelessness of the defendants in error.
It appears that at the time in question the railroad company owned and operated a line of railroad through the town of Depew and along its said line for the use and accommodation of the general public, and to facilitate its own business the railroad company had erected a depot in said town and that the cotton oil company had used some of the trucks of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CogswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oklahoma City Ry. Co. v. BarkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ZirkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Varela v. ReidArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Graybill v. ClancySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.